Professional Boundaries Statement
Statements such as these are designed to inform clients and colleagues about possible conflicts of interest, and the measures that are being taken to ensure that these are mitigated.
In my personal life I have a background of being in both long term “mono” relationships, and a period of being actively polysexual. I also self define as non-binary preference. I accept most pronouns although I self identify as male. I attend various LGBTQI* events and trainings, as well as socially, and it is quite possible that a client who self identifies as part of a group might find themselves in brief contact with me at such an event. This activity assists me in being gender identity knowledgeable, not just gender identity friendly.
In my personal life I have a very deeply embedded sense of faith and faith practice. This helps guide me in pastoral and faith based work where it is requested. This makes me faith knowledgeable, not just faith-friendly. Clients may notice references online or in faith publications about the fact that I am an ordained spiritual humanist and multifaith clergy. Clients may also find reference to my historic role as a Professor within an Interfaith Seminary (Church college effectively) based in New York (2000-2008 approx). I also have links with local Jewish and Kabbalah groups since I am half Jewish by birth and have a deep interest in Kabbalah and Western Tradition. I also attend trainings and practice of mindfulness and other Buddhist psychology practices, and Taoist based martial arts. I also occasionally provide articles or blog entries on faith issues. As part of being an office bearer in different faith related groups my full legal name is unusual and might be visible online, although in social and professional like I am simply “Stuart”.
A significant overlap exists between certain empowering faith groups and models and sexual identity models and there is potential cross over between certain education and support groups.
I am actively involved in politics on a local and national level. Nationally I am involved in the Psychotherapy and Counselling Union, the Alliance for Counselling and Psychotherapy, and I write a political “diary” column for a professional journal. I also contribute in the media with comments and letters. Locally I am involved in my local branch of the SNP and often am an office bearer.
I engage in a range of academic trainings and attend lectures with a number of groups, including the Royal Scottish Society of Arts and the Open University.
Edinburgh in particular is often referred to as a “little big city” and therefore there is the possibility of contact inadvertently outside the therapy field. Also interests of sexual identity training and spirituality tend to be niche groups, again with potential cross over.
I never impose or introduce spirituality or sexual identity related work into therapy unless clearly requested by the client or required by clinical need. Non-faith use of models such as mindfulness is explained and is by consent. In line with current thinking in critical psychotherapy, I do discuss social psychoanalytic issues / Gestalt fields of influence / the interaction between self and environment in session where appropriate. Where politics is part of the discussion. I do not seek to influence or change the politics of others.
I adhere to strict codes of ethics and practice including those of confidentiality. The initial assessment and agreement forms define these.
If I meet you outside of therapy context, I will be guided by you. If I ignore you it is because I have not noticed a “cue” to interact. If you approach me, I will acknowledge you as appropriate. I will avoid all mention of therapeutic affairs and I will keep contact brief.
If we meet in a training or education context, I will avoid any contact above and beyond the matter at hand, and will keep it brief, avoiding it at all if possible.
I will not “out” your status as a client, sexuality, spirituality or any other confidential nature of your “self”. I will choose to appear aloof to others, rather than be drawn into any conversation that might damage your confidentiality.
It is generally agreed that it is inappropriate to build friendships with clients, or their close family or acquaintances. If it is identified that there is a cross over socially, then unless this can be managed to the satisfaction of my clinical supervisor, I will refer. If at the initial assessment stage of therapy it is obvious that a conflict of interest may occur, such as predictable social contact, then therapy will not proceed and I will refer. These boundaries exist to protect the client and are considered good practice. Romantic and or sexual relationships are completely prohibited with current or former clients, and especially since I work with LGBTQI* clients, it is particularly important to maintain very clear and openly discussed boundaries to that effect.
At the time of writing I am in a long term committed mono relationship. If this status changes then this statement will be updated with any potential impact statements.
Contact via the contact us page HERE